CHIASMA, INC CHMA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1339469Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 95%
- Sep 2015 to Aug 2018
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in a filing · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Foley HoagFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Pearl CohenFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jul 2021 | Named in a filing | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Goodwin Procter | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Foley Hoag | May 2015 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| HALE AND DORR | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Pearl Cohen | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 44 | 1.15 | 0.68 | 1.35 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel LangGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Michael H. BisonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel LangGoodwin Procter | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 1.22 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Michael H. BisonGoodwin Procter | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Peter N. HandrinosLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 85 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.34 |