Majestic Capital, Ltd. CRMH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1338949Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Pitney HardinFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| Morgan Lewis | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Pitney Hardin | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 49 | 1.46 | 0.38 | 1.07 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PETER S. KOLEVZONKramer Levin Naftalis | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.58 |