Titanium Group LTD TTNUF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1338520Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2006 to Apr 2010
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Harney Westwood & RiegelsFirst linked Jun 2006 · Named in a filing · 238 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 1.02× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Dill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harney Westwood & Riegels | Jun 2006 | Named in a filing | 238 | 1.33 | 1.02 | 0.80 |
| Dill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 0.64 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- FAY M. MATSUKAGEDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 2.09× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Dean M. SmurthwaiteDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.53× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- ROBERT S. MCCORMACKDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Apr 2006 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Craig A. StonerDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C.First linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.95× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAY M. MATSUKAGEDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.36 | 2.09 | 0.79 |
| Dean M. SmurthwaiteDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 1.53 | 1.41 |
| ROBERT S. MCCORMACKDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Apr 2006 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 0.82 |
| Craig A. StonerDill Dill Carr Stonbraker & Hutchings, P.C. | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 1.95 | 0.63 |