DCP Midstream, LP DCP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1338065Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jul 2018 · Named in a filing · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Nov 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Kantrow Spaht Weaver & BlitzerFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracewell LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 1.03 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Mayer Brown | Jul 2018 | Named in a filing | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Holland & Hart | Nov 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Kantrow Spaht Weaver & Blitzer | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 11 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- G. Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- William S. AndersonBracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Scott A. BerdanHolland & HartFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Amy BowlerHolland & HartFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Jeffrey A. ShermanFaegre & BensonFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Lucy StarkHolland & HartFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Thomas P. MasonVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Mar 2023 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | Apr 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 1.11 |
| William S. AndersonBracewell LLP | Mar 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Scott A. BerdanHolland & Hart | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Amy BowlerHolland & Hart | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.77 | 1.30 | 0.88 |
| Jeffrey A. ShermanFaegre & Benson | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.79 | 1.61 | 1.21 |
| Lucy StarkHolland & Hart | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Douglas E. McWilliamsVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 62 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.10 |
| Thomas P. MasonVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.46 | 0.72 | 1.62 |
| Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | Mar 2023 | Text search only | 67 | 1.30 | 0.56 | 1.11 |