dELiAs, Inc. DLIA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1337885Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2006 to Dec 2014
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.88 |
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael S. BenHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joseph WalshTroutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLPFirst linked Feb 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael S. BenHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Feb 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joseph WalshTroutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP | Feb 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 1.53 | 1.66 | 1.28 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |