InfuSystem Holdings, Inc INFU (last ticker on record)
CIK 1337013Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stinson LLPFirst linked Jun 2019 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Stinson Leonard Street LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in a filing · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stinson LLP | Jun 2019 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Stinson Leonard Street LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in a filing | 46 | 0.91 | 0.96 | 0.94 |
| Husch Blackwell | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Morgan Lewis | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- B. Scott GooteeStinson LLPFirst linked Mar 2017 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Howard A. KennyMorgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B. Scott GooteeStinson LLP | Mar 2017 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.71 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Howard A. KennyMorgan Lewis | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.22 |