Under Armour, Inc. UA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1336917Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Dickstein ShapiroFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fried Frank | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | May 2006 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Alston & Bird | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Ballard Spahr | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Dickstein Shapiro | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 41 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Venable LLP | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| DLA Piper | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Piper Rudnick | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel J. BurskyFried FrankFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Mark HayekFried FrankFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.12×
- Stephen H. ShalenCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
- A. Richard SuskoCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel J. BurskyFried Frank | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 28 | 0.33 | 1.50 | 1.64 |
| Mark HayekFried Frank | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.41 | 0.00 | 3.12 |
| Stephen H. ShalenCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.54 |
| A. Richard SuskoCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 1.37 |