SouthPeak Interactive CORP SOPK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1336262Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Holme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 99 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Jones DayFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Holme Roberts & Owen LLP | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 99 | 1.31 | 0.90 | 1.28 |
| Graubard Miller | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Holland & Knight | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Jones Day | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in a filing · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Mark J. WishnerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.74× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Robert J. MittmanBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2008 | Named in a filing | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.11 |
| Mark J. WishnerGreenberg Traurig | Jan 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.64 | 1.74 | 2.24 |
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| Robert J. MittmanBlank Rome | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.72 | 0.43 | 2.58 |