Chisen Electric Corp CIEC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1335950Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Burton, Bartlett & GlogovacFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burton, Bartlett & Glogovac | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.35 | 1.58 | 1.02 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| K&L Gates | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| AllBright Law Offices | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew OgurickK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 153 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Eric L. RobinsonFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 2.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew OgurickK&L Gates | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.63 | 1.33 | 1.25 |
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.28 |
| Richard I. AnslowEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 153 | 1.23 | 1.12 | 0.95 |
| Eric L. Robinson | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 1.54 | 2.42 |