ISRAEL GROWTH PARTNERS ACQUISITION CORP. IGPAA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1335725Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Blank RomeFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Forbes HareFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Blank Rome | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Forbes Hare | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 57 | 1.00 | 1.64 | 0.82 |
| Graubard Miller | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason T. SimonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 120 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Mark J. WishnerGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 1.74× · 95% wipeout 2.24×
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Robert J. MittmanBlank RomeFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason T. SimonGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 120 | 0.68 | 0.30 | 1.11 |
| Mark J. WishnerGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.64 | 1.74 | 2.24 |
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| Robert J. MittmanBlank Rome | Sep 2005 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.72 | 0.43 | 2.58 |