KeyOn Communications Holdings Inc. KEYO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1335294Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Boyer & KetchandFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.87×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Dec 2008 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boyer & Ketchand | Jan 2009 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 1.87 |
| Haynes and Boone | Oct 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Mayer Brown | Dec 2008 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Rick A. WernerHaynes and BooneFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Rita J. LeaderBoyer & KetchandFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Harvey J. KesnerSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rick A. WernerHaynes and Boone | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 64 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Rita J. LeaderBoyer & Ketchand | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.48 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Harvey J. KesnerSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Oct 2007 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.02 | 0.90 | 1.50 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |