MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORP MHRCQ (last ticker on record)

CIK 1335190Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
95% wipeout
Bankruptcy
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 5; Newest began Dec 2015
Largest fall in its shares: 99%; Feb 2014 to Dec 2015
Law firms: 14; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 7; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Dec 15, 2015Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 15, 2015Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 16, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 24, 2015Shares down 95% from their high
Sep 4, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 3, 2015A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 14, 2013A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
May 17, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 31, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 22, 2012Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 29, 2010Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 5, 2007Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Kirkland & Ellis	Apr 2016	Named in a filing	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Wyatt Tarrant & Combs	Jan 2013	Named in a filing	53	1.40	0.35	1.08
Blake Cassels & Graydon	Mar 2011	Named in a filing	227	0.73	0.49	0.80
Fulbright & Jaworski	Sep 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	359	1.10	0.75	1.35
Greenberg Traurig	Jul 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	1,223	1.01	1.03	1.10
Bracewell LLP	Aug 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	247	0.93	0.31	1.03
Preston Gates & Ellis	Mar 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	159	1.36	1.62	1.44
LeClairRyan A Professional Corporation	Mar 2015	Text search only	93	0.77	0.42	1.10
Norton Rose	Jun 2013	Text search only	304	1.11	0.52	1.24
Dorsey & Whitney LLP	Jan 2013	Text search only	630	0.83	0.73	1.16
Shearman & Sterling	Jan 2013	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Thompson & Knight	Mar 2011	Text search only	198	1.03	0.40	1.38
Holme Roberts & Owen LLP	Sep 2009	Text search only	99	1.31	0.90	1.28
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Jun 2006	Text search only	783	1.09	0.11	1.03

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Emily LeitchShearman & Sterling	Jul 2014	Named in SEC correspondence	11	0.00	0.00	1.21
David E. MorrisonFulbright & Jaworski	Sep 2009	Named in SEC correspondence	11	1.73	0.00	2.11
Charles StillBracewell LLP	Aug 2007	Named in SEC correspondence	25	0.31	0.00	1.71
Daniel K. DonahueGreenberg Traurig	Mar 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	31	1.10	0.38	1.68
Garth B. JensenHolme Roberts & Owen LLP	Sep 2009	Text search only	22	1.12	1.51	1.36
T. Mark KellyVinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Jun 2006	Text search only	55	1.64	0.20	1.96
Michael J. Morrison	Mar 2006	Text search only	54	1.51	1.78	0.64