NCI, Inc. NCIT (last ticker on record)
CIK 1334478Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jul 2017 · Named in a filing · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Brown & AssociatesFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.55×
- Dickstein ShapiroFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Hastings | Jul 2017 | Named in a filing | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Brown & Associates | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 19 | 1.19 | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Dickstein Shapiro | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 41 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Piper Rudnick | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
| Shaw Pittman | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey B. GrillPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Mar 2010 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.53×
- Craig E. ChasonPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Jason C. HarmonDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.37×
- John M. McDonaldShaw PittmanFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey B. GrillPillsbury Winthrop | Mar 2010 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.53 |
| Craig E. ChasonPillsbury Winthrop | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| Jason C. HarmonDLA Piper | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 21 | 2.36 | 0.00 | 0.37 |
| John M. McDonaldShaw Pittman | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.00 |