Harry & David Holdings, Inc.
CIK 1334127Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Jones DayFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- SILLER WILKFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.07× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Jones Day | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| SILLER WILK | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 0.95 | 1.07 | 0.95 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher M. KellyJones DayFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- John D. AmorosiDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert A. ProfusekJones DayFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher M. KellyJones Day | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 56 | 1.20 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| John D. AmorosiDavis Polk | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 17 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert A. ProfusekJones Day | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 47 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.93 |