Dealertrack Technologies, Inc TRAK (last ticker on record)

CIK 1333513Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restructuring
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 1; Newest began Jan 2009
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 13; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Oct 1, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 9, 2009Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Goodwin Procter	Sep 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Latham & Watkins LLP	Jul 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
O Melveny & Myers LLP	Jul 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	589	1.07	0.25	1.07
Farrell Fritz	Sep 2005	Text search only	10	0.74	1.84	0.67
Kelley Drye & Warren	Sep 2005	Text search only	152	1.24	0.53	1.21
Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.	Sep 2005	Text search only	51	1.26	0.95	1.31
White & Case	Sep 2005	Text search only	907	1.04	0.33	0.91
Davis Polk	Jul 2005	Text search only	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
LeClairRyan A Professional Corporation	Jul 2005	Text search only	93	0.77	0.42	1.10
Pillsbury Winthrop	Jul 2005	Text search only	516	1.13	0.82	1.27
Proskauer Rose	Jul 2005	Text search only	492	1.15	0.48	1.08

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Paul S. ScrivanoO Melveny & Myers LLP	Aug 2014	Named in a filing	19	1.32	0.00	0.69
Scott LesmesMorrison & Foerster	Dec 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	19	2.29	0.00	0.88
Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter	Sep 2006	Named in a filing	59	0.66	0.00	1.09
John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP	Oct 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	61	1.12	0.00	1.74
Daniel NamWhite & Case	Sep 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	7	0.00	0.00	0.00
Kenneth J. GordonGoodwin Procter	Sep 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	25	1.18	1.09	0.41
Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLP	Jul 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	52	0.77	0.00	0.80
Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk	Jul 2005	Named in a filing	149	0.91	0.00	1.06
Michael J. MinahanGoodwin Procter	Aug 2006	Text search only	31	1.61	0.91	1.80
JOHN J. SUYDAMO'Sullivan Graev & Karabell	Sep 2005	Text search only	12	0.80	0.00	0.89
Neil W. RustWhite & Case	Sep 2005	Text search only	5	1.12	0.00	0.00
Adam J. KanslerProskauer Rose	Jul 2005	Text search only	8	1.10	0.00	0.00
Charles F. NiemethBaker & McKenzie	Jul 2005	Text search only	6	1.00	0.00	0.00