Triple Crown Media, Inc. TCMI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1333291Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Sep 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2005 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in a filing · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & HirschtrittFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.43× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Oct 2009 | Named in a filing | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Proskauer Rose | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| King & Spalding | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Tannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 20 | 0.67 | 1.43 | 1.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Erica H. SteinbergerLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.64×
- Arnold S. JacobsProskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Stephen RosenbergTannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & HirschtrittFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erica H. SteinbergerLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 3.64 |
| Arnold S. JacobsProskauer Rose | Sep 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.29 | 2.39 | 1.12 |
| Stephen RosenbergTannenbaum Helpern Syracuse & Hirschtritt | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 1.40 | 0.00 | 4.06 |