Focus Media Holding LTD FMCN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1330017Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Jan 2013 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Global Law OfficeFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Jan 2013 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Global Law Office | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 67 | 1.06 | 0.80 | 1.14 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Maples and Calder | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephanie TangShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.83× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Jesse SheleyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Fan ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Chao Yang DistrictO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 2007 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanie TangShearman & Sterling | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.49 | 1.83 | 0.50 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |
| Jesse SheleyKirkland & Ellis | Dec 2012 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.41 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.65 |
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Fan ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 8 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.84 |
| Chao Yang DistrictO Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 14 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 2007 | Text search only | 22 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| OR FORMATIONSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 160 | 1.27 | 0.15 | 0.90 |