OSL Holdings Inc. OSLH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1329957Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Anthony L.G., PLLCFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.92× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Stepp Law GroupFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucosky Brookman LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 223 | 1.24 | 2.05 | 1.19 |
| Anthony L.G., PLLC | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 136 | 1.02 | 1.92 | 1.02 |
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| Stepp Law Group | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 103 | 0.81 | 1.47 | 0.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lawrence MetelitsaLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 2.87× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Lazarus RothsteinAnthony L.G., PLLCFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- David N. FeldmanFeldman WeinsteinFirst linked Apr 2013 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Thomas E. Stepp Jr.Stepp Law GroupFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence MetelitsaLucosky Brookman LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.43 | 2.87 | 1.38 |
| Lazarus RothsteinAnthony L.G., PLLC | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.60 | 2.53 | 1.03 |
| David N. FeldmanFeldman Weinstein | Apr 2013 | Named in a filing | 145 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 1.16 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Thomas E. Stepp Jr.Stepp Law Group | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 110 | 0.67 | 1.40 | 0.79 |