NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. NTLS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1328571Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Troutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 335 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Wiley ReinFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Troutman Sanders LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 335 | 1.15 | 0.61 | 1.16 |
| Hunton & Williams | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Davis Polk | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Wiley Rein | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 38 | 0.86 | 0.52 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven M. HaasHunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David I. MeyersTroutman Sanders LLPFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- David M. CarterHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Phillip R. MillsDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven M. HaasHunton & Williams | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David I. MeyersTroutman Sanders LLP | Mar 2006 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.12 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| David M. CarterHunton & Williams | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Phillip R. MillsDavis Polk | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 |