DG Acquisition Corp.
CIK 1328455Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willkie Farr | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Graubard Miller | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- WILLIAM N. DYEWillkie FarrFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.68× · 95% wipeout 5.48×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Paul D. BroudeFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILLIAM N. DYEWillkie Farr | Oct 2005 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 3.68 | 5.48 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.33 |
| Paul D. BroudeFoley & Lardner | Jun 2005 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.30 | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.20 |