Imprivata Inc IMPR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1328015Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- McCarter & EnglishFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 141 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Foley Hoag | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| McCarter & English | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 141 | 1.18 | 0.69 | 0.78 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ryan SansomCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Kenneth J. GordonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- William J. SchnoorGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan SansomCooley LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.93 |
| David A. WestenbergWILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.16 |
| Kenneth J. GordonGoodwin Procter | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.18 | 1.09 | 0.41 |
| William J. SchnoorGoodwin Procter | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.14 |