Celator Pharmaceuticals Inc CPXX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1327467Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Farris Vaughan Wills & MurphyFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.47× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Duane Morris | Nov 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Farris Vaughan Wills & Murphy | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 25 | 0.60 | 1.47 | 0.99 |
| Holland & Knight | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- David B. FeirsteinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John W. KauffmanDuane MorrisFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 2.15×
- Kathleen M. ShayDuane MorrisFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- R. Hector MacKay-DunnFarris Vaughan Wills & MurphyFirst linked Nov 2012 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 3.40× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| David B. FeirsteinKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John W. KauffmanDuane Morris | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 2.15 |
| Kathleen M. ShayDuane Morris | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| R. Hector MacKay-DunnFarris Vaughan Wills & Murphy | Nov 2012 | Text search only | 9 | 0.93 | 3.40 | 0.34 |