TWC Holding LLC
CIK 1326531Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 104 | 0.49 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2005 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Winston & Strawn | May 2005 | Text search only | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Benjamin M. PolkSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- David A. SakowitzWinston & StrawnFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Helene R. BanksCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- NICHOLAS P. SAGGESEHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benjamin M. PolkSchulte Roth & Zabel | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Michael R. LittenbergSchulte Roth & Zabel | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.18 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| David A. SakowitzWinston & Strawn | May 2005 | Text search only | 47 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 1.05 |
| Helene R. BanksCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| NICHOLAS P. SAGGESEHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 26 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 1.40 |