Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc. KEYP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1326396Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2011 to Dec 2014
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Watson Farley & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 93 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Hunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 251 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- LESER HUNTER TAUBMAN&TAUBMANFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- King & WoodFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Louis E. TaubmanFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.91×
- Z.A.G./S&W LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.31× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Watson Farley & Williams | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 93 | 0.59 | 0.32 | 1.37 |
| Hunter Taubman Fischer | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 251 | 1.06 | 1.77 | 1.12 |
| LESER HUNTER TAUBMAN&TAUBMAN | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.68 | 2.28 | 2.58 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
| King & Wood | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Louis E. Taubman | May 2010 | Text search only | 12 | 1.57 | 0.69 | 1.91 |
| Z.A.G./S&W LLP | May 2010 | Text search only | 10 | 2.31 | 1.18 | 2.22 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hunter Taubman WeissHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 2.44×
- Louis TaubmanHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.87× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Eric M. SteinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.85× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Joy Z. HuiRobinson & Cole LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.63× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Arila ZhouHunter Taubman FischerFirst linked Mar 2012 · Text search only · 70 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Taubman WeissHunter Taubman Fischer | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.70 | 1.91 | 2.44 |
| Louis TaubmanHunter Taubman Fischer | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 1.27 | 0.87 | 1.43 |
| Eric M. SteinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 60 | 1.01 | 1.85 | 1.45 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| Joy Z. HuiRobinson & Cole LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 14 | 3.63 | 1.00 | 0.76 |
| Arila ZhouHunter Taubman Fischer | Mar 2012 | Text search only | 70 | 1.62 | 0.94 | 1.24 |