Sundance Energy Inc. SNDE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1326089Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Mayer Brown | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Heath C. TrisdaleKing & SpaldingFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.05×
- Andrew ReillyBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.06× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- David S. BakstMayer BrownFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Kirk TuckerThompson & KnightFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- William D. Davis IIBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heath C. TrisdaleKing & Spalding | Feb 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.56 | 0.00 | 2.05 |
| Andrew ReillyBaker & McKenzie | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 3.06 | 0.91 |
| David S. BakstMayer Brown | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Kirk TuckerThompson & Knight | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| William D. Davis IIBaker & McKenzie | Oct 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.44 |