Innophos, Inc. IPHS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1325946Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- COHN BIRNBAUM & SHEAFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| COHN BIRNBAUM & SHEA | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 2.30 | 0.00 | 1.98 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2006 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Christopher A. KitchenKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2006 | Text search only | 25 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.09 |