Aleritas Capital Corp. ARTAE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1325823Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winston & Strawn | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Foley & Lardner | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Leland E. HutchinsonWinston & StrawnFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.89× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Terrence R. BradyWinston & StrawnFirst linked Nov 2007 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.33× · Went dark 2.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Thomas E. HartmanFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 2.31×
- Douglas E. HaasBenesch Friedlander Coplan & AronoffFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 1.78× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & CaseFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Philip R. WeingoldKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.83× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leland E. HutchinsonWinston & Strawn | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.89 | 1.63 | 0.97 |
| Terrence R. BradyWinston & Strawn | Nov 2007 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.33 | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Thomas E. HartmanFoley & Lardner | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.76 | 1.80 | 2.31 |
| Douglas E. HaasBenesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.66 | 1.78 | 0.00 |
| Joel L. RubinsteinWhite & Case | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 1.03 |
| Philip R. WeingoldKramer Levin Naftalis | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.83 | 1.56 | 1.44 |