Advanced BioEnergy, LLC
CIK 1325740Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Husch BlackwellFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Husch Blackwell | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 154 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 1.18 |
| Faegre & Benson | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jonathan R. ZimmermanFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Peter J. EkbergFaegre & BensonFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 3.88× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Miranda L. HughesFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher R. SackettFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Harold N. SchneebeckFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William E. HaniganFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jonathan R. ZimmermanFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.45 | 0.55 | 1.56 |
| Peter J. EkbergFaegre & Benson | Sep 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.66 | 3.88 | 1.58 |
| Miranda L. Hughes | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.00 |
| Christopher R. Sackett | May 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.00 |
| Harold N. Schneebeck | May 2005 | Text search only | 15 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
| William E. Hanigan | May 2005 | Text search only | 21 | 0.00 | 0.29 | 0.00 |