MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp MX (last ticker on record)

CIK 1325702Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
Restructuring

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 3; Newest began Apr 2025
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 28; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 16; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

May 13, 2025Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Apr 8, 2025Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 7, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 1, 2017An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Feb 23, 2017Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 5, 2016Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Apr 4, 2016Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 4, 2015Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 17, 2015Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
Apr 6, 2015Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 12, 2015A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
Dec 5, 2014Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 7, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 25, 2014Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 4, 2014Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 11, 2014Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 7, 2008Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Goodwin Procter	Jun 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	1,221	0.79	0.31	1.17
Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	May 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	826	1.02	0.18	0.83
DLA Piper	Mar 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	1,184	1.00	0.45	1.20
Kim & Chang	Jul 2005	Named in a filing	9	0.85	0.00	0.00
Conyers Dill & Pearman	Jun 2005	Named in a filing	531	0.89	0.35	1.16
Dechert LLP	Jun 2005	Named in a filing	434	0.84	0.41	0.96
Greenberg Traurig	Jun 2005	Named in a filing	1,223	1.01	1.03	1.10
Harney Westwood & Riegels	Jun 2005	Named in a filing	238	1.34	1.02	0.76
Latham & Watkins LLP	Jun 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
White & Case	Jun 2005	Named in a filing	907	1.04	0.33	0.91
Alston & Bird	Feb 2011	Text search only	583	0.99	0.39	0.79
Sidley Austin	Feb 2011	Text search only	1,210	1.30	0.14	0.93
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett	Feb 2011	Text search only	1,396	1.28	0.11	0.92
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan	Feb 2011	Text search only	178	0.98	0.78	0.96
Winston & Strawn	Feb 2011	Text search only	585	1.18	0.60	1.02
Shearman & Sterling	Aug 2010	Text search only	2,649	1.21	0.13	0.87
Jones Day	Aug 2010	Text search only	686	1.25	0.54	1.12
Drinker Biddle & Reath	Apr 2010	Text search only	213	1.46	0.77	1.25
Lowenstein Sandler	Apr 2010	Text search only	297	1.12	0.70	1.42
Akin Gump	Mar 2010	Text search only	582	1.24	0.52	1.25
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Mar 2010	Text search only	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Heller Ehrman	Mar 2008	Text search only	256	1.00	0.76	0.96
Bae Kim & Lee	Jun 2005	Text search only	14	0.83	0.00	0.44
Davis Polk	Jun 2005	Text search only	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
Kirkland & Ellis	Jun 2005	Text search only	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Squire Sanders (US)	Jun 2005	Text search only	199	0.88	0.98	1.13
Sullivan & Cromwell	Jun 2005	Text search only	1,047	1.40	0.15	0.69
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jun 2005	Text search only	1,468	1.09	0.60	1.42

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
David S. HuntingtonPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison	May 2017	Named in SEC correspondence	51	0.67	0.00	0.80
W. Stuart OggGoodwin Procter	Aug 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	17	1.36	0.00	0.65
Keith BensonLatham & Watkins LLP	Mar 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	17	1.62	0.00	0.54
Kirk A. DavenportLatham & Watkins LLP	Mar 2010	Named in SEC correspondence	52	0.77	0.00	0.80
Micheal J. ReaganDLA Piper	Mar 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	5	1.60	0.00	1.04
Peter M. AstizDLA Piper	Mar 2008	Named in SEC correspondence	22	1.51	0.77	1.41
Thomas J. FriedmannDechert LLP	Nov 2007	Named in a filing	29	0.82	0.00	0.00
Eric S. SiegelDechert LLP	Jun 2005	Named in a filing	13	1.52	0.00	0.00
W. Stuart Ogg Jones DayFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP	Aug 2010	Text search only	5	1.86	0.00	1.00
Sarah K. SolumDavis Polk	Mar 2008	Text search only	44	1.07	0.00	1.57
David ThomasWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Nov 2007	Text search only	7	0.70	0.00	0.73
Geraldine A. SinatraDechert LLP	Jun 2005	Text search only	17	1.12	0.00	0.00
Robert A. ZuccaroLatham & Watkins LLP	Jun 2005	Text search only	21	1.07	0.00	0.49
Steven E. BochnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati	Jun 2005	Text search only	63	1.34	0.00	0.72
Sung KimGreenberg Traurig	Jun 2005	Text search only	6	1.24	6.24	1.34
William M. KellyDavis Polk	Jun 2005	Text search only	12	1.18	0.00	0.00