CLAYTON HOLDINGS INC CLAY (last ticker on record)
CIK 1325228Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Bell Boyd & LloydFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Shipman & GoodwinFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Bell Boyd & Lloyd | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 50 | 1.36 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Shipman & Goodwin | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 54 | 1.25 | 0.82 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John R. LeClaireGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Michael S. TurnerGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 1.54× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John R. LeClaireGoodwin Procter | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| Michael S. TurnerGoodwin Procter | Nov 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.04 | 1.54 | 0.99 |
| Arthur R. McGivernGoodwin Procter | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 32 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.24 |