RBC Bearings INC RBC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1324948Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | May 2005 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Joshua N. KorffKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Stuart H. GelfondFried FrankFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Valerie Ford JacobFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Bruce D. MeyerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joshua N. KorffKirkland & Ellis | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 107 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.43 |
| Stuart H. GelfondFried Frank | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 50 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Valerie Ford JacobFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.38 |
| Bruce D. MeyerGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | May 2005 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |