AMERICAN COMMERCIAL LINES INC. ACLI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1324479Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Sidley Austin | Jul 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lillian TsuCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & HartsonFirst linked May 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Michael J. SilverHogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lillian TsuCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & Hartson | May 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.55 | 1.00 | 1.02 |
| Michael J. SilverHogan & Hartson | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 30 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.39 |