AMERICAN BARGE LINE CO
CIK 1324477Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & MosleFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Thompson CoburnFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Daniels | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt & Mosle | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 35 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 2.03 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Sidley Austin | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
| Thompson Coburn | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 85 | 1.13 | 1.01 | 1.33 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- JAMES A. ASCHLEMANBaker & DanielsFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAMES A. ASCHLEMANBaker & Daniels | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 15 | 1.55 | 1.33 | 1.47 |
| Tracy K. EdmonsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 26 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 1.26 |