Chardan North China Acquisition Corp CNCA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1324297Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Mar 2006 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Guantao Law FirmFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Piper Rudnick | Mar 2006 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.78 |
| Guantao Law Firm | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 22 | 1.90 | 1.03 | 0.93 |
| Graubard Miller | May 2005 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Marty B. LorenzoDLA PiperFirst linked Jul 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Douglas J. ReinDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Robert J. MittmanBlank RomeFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 2.50×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marty B. LorenzoDLA Piper | Jul 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Douglas J. ReinDLA Piper | Mar 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.08 | 0.49 | 0.81 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.28 |
| Robert J. MittmanBlank Rome | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 1.72 | 0.44 | 2.50 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | May 2005 | Text search only | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.19 |