AtriCure, Inc. ATRC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1323885Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Covington & BurlingFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 447 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Frost Brown ToddFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLPFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Greenebaum Doll & McDonaldFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epstein Becker & Green | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Cooley LLP | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Covington & Burling | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 447 | 1.07 | 0.27 | 0.99 |
| Frost Brown Todd | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 90 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Davis Wright Tremaine LLP | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 130 | 0.97 | 0.59 | 1.27 |
| Greenebaum Doll & McDonald | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 24 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- F. Mark ReuterKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
- Mark A. WeissKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan D. SchnitzerSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.48× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. Mark ReuterKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.48 | 0.00 | 0.40 |
| Mark A. WeissKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Alan D. SchnitzerSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 8 | 3.48 | 0.00 | 0.00 |