PACIFIC ENERGY RESOURCES LTD

CIK 1323770Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

None

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 0; None on record
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 9; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 1; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Rutan & Tucker	Feb 2008	Named in a filing	60	0.92	0.97	1.08
Latham & Watkins LLP	Feb 2008	Text search only	2,667	0.98	0.31	1.10
Loeb & Loeb LLP	Feb 2008	Text search only	838	0.92	0.99	1.10
Patton Boggs	Feb 2008	Text search only	186	0.92	0.76	1.35
Reed Smith	Feb 2008	Text search only	487	1.15	0.77	1.13
Shipman & Goodwin	Feb 2008	Text search only	54	1.25	0.82	1.18
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Feb 2008	Text search only	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Thompson & Knight	Feb 2008	Text search only	198	1.03	0.40	1.38
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.	Feb 2008	Text search only	783	1.09	0.11	1.03

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

GREGG AMBERRutan & TuckerFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×