GLOBAL PARTNERS LP GLP (last ticker on record)
CIK 1323468Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bennett JonesFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Day Pitney LLPFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- Schwabe Williamson & WyattFirst linked Mar 2015 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 2.72×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Mar 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bennett Jones | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.27 | 0.16 | 1.29 |
| Day Pitney LLP | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 69 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt | Mar 2015 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.29 | 2.10 | 2.72 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Mar 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| K&L Gates | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brenda LenahanVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Alan P. BadenVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda LenahanVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 1.52 | 0.00 | 1.36 |
| Alan P. BadenVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.88 |