Spansion Inc. CODE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1322705Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- / S / O M ELVENY & M YERSFirst linked Nov 2006 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2008 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Apr 2005 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | May 2010 | Text search only | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| / S / O M ELVENY & M YERS | Nov 2006 | Text search only | 19 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 1.35 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael S. RinglerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.50×
- Alan F. DenenbergDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 114 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Apr 2008 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Karen K. DreyfusO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.50×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Robert W. PhillipsCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Scott C. HerlihyLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.06×
- Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael S. RinglerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2015 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 1.50 |
| Alan F. DenenbergDavis Polk | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 114 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Mark B. BaudlerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Apr 2008 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Karen K. DreyfusO Melveny & Myers LLP | Oct 2006 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 2.50 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Robert W. PhillipsCooley LLP | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.67 | 1.05 | 1.02 |
| Scott C. HerlihyLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 19 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.74 |
| Victoria HaleSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 52 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 2.06 |
| Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 58 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.41 |