Origin Agritech LTD SEED (last ticker on record)
CIK 1321851Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jan 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- King & WoodFirst linked Apr 2025 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Apr 2020 · Text search only · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Guantao Law FirmFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.49 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Maples and Calder | Jul 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| King & Wood | Apr 2025 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
| Davis Polk | Apr 2020 | Text search only | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Graubard Miller | May 2005 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.15 |
| Guantao Law Firm | May 2005 | Text search only | 22 | 1.90 | 1.03 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Howard ZhangDavis PolkFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked May 2005 · Named in a filing · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.69 | 1.66 | 1.38 |
| Howard ZhangDavis Polk | Sep 2007 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | May 2005 | Named in a filing | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.28 |