Diamond Foods Inc DMND (last ticker on record)

CIK 1320947Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
SEC/DOJ scrutiny
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Jan 2014
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 11; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Mar 1, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 9, 2014SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Jan 9, 2014An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Jan 9, 2014An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Jun 10, 2013Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Oct 25, 2012Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 7, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 14, 2012Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 8, 2012Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 15, 2011A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Dec 12, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 15, 2011Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Jenner & Block	Mar 2016	Named in a filing	122	1.12	0.78	0.94
Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft	Jun 2011	Named in a filing	305	1.14	0.24	0.95
Alston & Bird	Mar 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	583	0.99	0.39	0.79
Fenwick & West LLP	Mar 2005	Named in SEC correspondence	443	0.95	0.21	1.23
Jones Day	Jun 2011	Text search only	686	1.25	0.54	1.12
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP	Jun 2011	Text search only	1,051	1.31	0.27	0.91
Chapman and Cutler	Mar 2005	Text search only	95	1.17	0.32	0.93
Downey Brand	Mar 2005	Text search only	13	0.61	0.00	0.46
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP	Mar 2005	Text search only	500	1.12	0.61	1.08
Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.	Mar 2005	Text search only	995	1.46	0.37	0.80
Willkie Farr	Mar 2005	Text search only	539	1.23	0.40	0.84

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Jason CasellaJenner & Block	Mar 2016	Named in a filing	7	1.18	0.00	1.30
Kevin T. CollinsJenner & Block	Mar 2016	Named in a filing	19	0.97	1.60	0.82
Martin C. GlassJenner & Block	Mar 2016	Named in a filing	18	0.68	0.00	1.52
Douglas N. CogenFenwick & West LLP	Jun 2011	Named in a filing	26	0.94	0.00	0.20
Gordon K. DavidsonFenwick & West LLP	Mar 2005	Named in a filing	67	1.09	0.00	1.15
William L. HughesFenwick & West LLP	Mar 2005	Named in a filing	41	1.12	0.94	1.37
David K. MichaelsFenwick & West LLP	Jun 2011	Text search only	64	1.53	0.00	0.67
Randi C. Lesnick	Jun 2011	Text search only	5	1.44	0.00	0.00
Robert A. ProfusekJones Day	Jun 2011	Text search only	47	1.41	0.00	0.93
John F. Kennedy	Mar 2005	Text search only	190	1.52	0.60	1.17
Scott OrtweinAlston & Bird	Mar 2005	Text search only	17	0.48	0.00	0.64