BioElectronics Corp
CIK 1320869Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Preston Gates & EllisFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Jun 2006 · Text search only · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Preston Gates & Ellis | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 159 | 1.36 | 1.62 | 1.44 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
| Pryor Cashman | Jun 2006 | Text search only | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert S. MatlinK&L GatesFirst linked Feb 2006 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.32× · Went dark 2.57× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & MittmanFirst linked Jan 2007 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 2.89× · 95% wipeout 1.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert S. MatlinK&L Gates | Feb 2006 | Named in a filing | 32 | 2.32 | 2.57 | 1.22 |
| Barbara R. MittmanGrushko & Mittman | Jan 2007 | Text search only | 33 | 1.17 | 2.89 | 1.54 |