Lazard Group Finance LLC LDZ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1320766Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akin GumpFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akin Gump | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 582 | 1.21 | 0.52 | 1.16 |
| HALE AND DORR | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 889 | 1.29 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Erik R. TavzelCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.25×
- Gavin D. SolotarWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Craig M. WassermanWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Kris F. HeinzelmanCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 68 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erik R. TavzelCravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 19 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 2.25 |
| Gavin D. SolotarWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 8 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Craig M. WassermanWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 33 | 1.49 | 1.05 | 0.62 |
| Kris F. HeinzelmanCravath Swaine & Moore | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 68 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.93 |