Juniper Content Corp JNPC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1318862Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Davis & GilbertFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Eaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Gusrae Kaplan & BrunoFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Littman KrooksFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Meister Seelig & FeinFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Graubard Miller | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Davis & Gilbert | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 20 | 1.52 | 0.58 | 1.52 |
| Eaton & Van Winkle LLP | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 49 | 0.35 | 1.45 | 1.17 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Gusrae Kaplan & Bruno | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 76 | 0.60 | 1.31 | 0.89 |
| Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 37 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 1.34 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Littman Krooks | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 32 | 0.88 | 0.65 | 2.07 |
| Meister Seelig & Fein | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 24 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Brad L. ShiffmanBlank RomeFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Robert J. MittmanBlank RomeFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.43× · 95% wipeout 2.58×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Apr 2005 · Text search only · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad L. ShiffmanBlank Rome | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.33 | 0.74 | 1.61 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.33 |
| Robert J. MittmanBlank Rome | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 47 | 1.72 | 0.43 | 2.58 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Apr 2005 | Text search only | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.20 |