Umatrin Holding Ltd UMHL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1317839Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Szaferman, Lakind, Blumstein & Blader, P.C.First linked May 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 2.02× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in a filing · 375 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 1.40× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lucosky Brookman LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 223 | 1.24 | 2.05 | 1.19 |
| Szaferman, Lakind, Blumstein & Blader, P.C. | May 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 84 | 0.59 | 2.02 | 1.04 |
| ANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2008 | Named in a filing | 375 | 1.17 | 1.40 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jason YeOrtoli Rosenstadt LLPFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 107 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 188 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jason YeOrtoli Rosenstadt LLP | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 107 | 1.35 | 0.98 | 1.39 |
| Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 188 | 1.24 | 1.81 | 1.24 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |