BOISE CASCADE HOLDINGS, L.L.C.
CIK 1317436Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Theodora Oringher PCFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Graubard Miller | May 2010 | Text search only | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | May 2010 | Text search only | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2010 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Theodora Oringher PC | May 2010 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Philip R. WeingoldKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.83× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- MARK B. TRESNOWSKIKirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2005 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Dennis M. MyersKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip R. WeingoldKramer Levin Naftalis | May 2010 | Text search only | 6 | 2.83 | 1.56 | 1.44 |
| MARK B. TRESNOWSKIKirkland & Ellis | May 2005 | Text search only | 5 | 1.96 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Dennis M. MyersKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.64 |