Montvale Technologies, Inc. IVVI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1316925Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC trading suspensionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Shulman Rogers, P.A.First linked May 2005 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.71× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Shulman Rogers, P.A. | May 2005 | Text search only | 25 | 2.71 | 1.26 | 1.16 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Steve SkolnickLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Oct 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 6.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Frank J. HaritonFRANK J. HARITON ATTORNEY - AT - LAWFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.83× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein Sandler | Feb 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Steve SkolnickLowenstein Sandler | Oct 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 6.08 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Frank J. HaritonFRANK J. HARITON ATTORNEY - AT - LAW | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 52 | 0.77 | 0.83 | 0.75 |