Synova Healthcare Group Inc SNVH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1316826Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Dec 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2007 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Gordon SilverFirst linked Jun 2005 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Grushko & MittmanFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 103 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 2.53× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- RUBIN, BAILIN & ORTOLI LLPFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.79× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2007 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Gordon Silver | Jun 2005 | Text search only | 22 | 0.46 | 0.70 | 1.17 |
| Grushko & Mittman | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 103 | 1.19 | 2.53 | 1.25 |
| RUBIN, BAILIN & ORTOLI LLP | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 1.79 | 2.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan L. ZeigerBlank RomeFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.50× · 95% wipeout 2.02×
- Jeffrey M. TaylorBlank RomeFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.12× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Alan H. LieblichBlank RomeFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan L. ZeigerBlank Rome | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 2.50 | 2.02 |
| Jeffrey M. TaylorBlank Rome | May 2006 | Text search only | 7 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 0.00 |
| Alan H. LieblichBlank Rome | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 11 | 0.83 | 1.58 | 1.48 |