Anthera Pharmaceuticals Inc ANTH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1316175Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2011 to Dec 2018
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jan 2010 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Oct 2009 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jan 2010 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Perkins Coie | Oct 2009 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bradley C. WeberGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2012 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.87× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.04×
- Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Bradley A. BugdanowitzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 2.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley C. WeberGoodwin Procter | Jan 2012 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.87 | 0.00 | 3.04 |
| Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLP | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| Bradley A. BugdanowitzGoodwin Procter | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.42 | 1.08 | 2.10 |