Teavana Holdings Inc TEA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1314592Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Arnall Golden GregoryFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Jones DayFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Schiff HardinFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 92 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Arnall Golden Gregory | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 60 | 0.66 | 1.11 | 1.13 |
| Jones Day | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Schiff Hardin | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 184 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.26 |
| Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 92 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jay SmithNovi & Wilkin Attorneys at LawFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 2.37× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher C. PaciDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Michael J. SchiavoneShearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay SmithNovi & Wilkin Attorneys at Law | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.80 | 2.37 | 0.00 |
| Christopher C. PaciDLA Piper | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Michael J. SchiavoneShearman & Sterling | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |