Ormat Funding Corp.
CIK 1312500Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Feb 2005 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Hale Lane Peek Dennison and HowardFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Steel Hector & DavisFirst linked Dec 2004 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chadbourne & Parke | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.82 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Feb 2005 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.23 |
| Hale Lane Peek Dennison and Howard | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.41 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 1.00 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 500 | 1.10 | 0.61 | 1.06 |
| Paul Hastings | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Perkins Coie | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Reed Smith | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.12 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.41 |
| Steel Hector & Davis | Dec 2004 | Text search only | 26 | 1.36 | 0.58 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip L. ColbranChadbourne & Parke | Dec 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.00 |